Alle Publikationen

  • Erweiterte Suche öffnen

Treffer: 2
  • <<
  • 1

  • 2017

  • Mussakhojayeva, S.; Sandygulova, A. (2017) : Cross-cultural differences for adaptive strategies of robots in public spaces: 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN): Lisbon, Portugal: IEEE Robotics & Automation Society, S. 573-578

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172360 

    Abstract: Robots deployed in public spaces must necessarily deal with situations that demand them to engage humans in a socially and culturally appropriate manner. However, social environments are often complex and ambiguous: many queries to the robot are collaborative (e.g. a family), and in case of conflicting queries, social robots need to participate in value decisions and negotiating multi-party interactions. Given the strong influence of the people’s demographic information and social schema among people, such as relationships and hierarchies, the focus of this research is to examine whether and how people exhibit socio-psychological effects with a shared robot deployed at international events or spaces (e.g. airports). With the aim to investigate who robots should adapt to (children or adults) in multi-party situations within human-robot interactions in public spaces and whether this adaptation can be influenced by culture, this paper presents a cross-cultural study conducted online. The results include a number of interesting findings based on people’s relationship with a child and their parental status. In addition, a number of cross-cultural differences were identified in respondents’ attitude towards robot’s multi-party adaptation in various public settings.

    Keywords: Airports, Angemessen(heit) (von Technik), control engineering computing, cross-cultural differences, cultural aspects, Cultural differences, Face recognition, Foot, human-robot interaction, human-robot interactions, ieee xplore, multiparty adaptation, PSYCHOLOGY, public spaces, Robots, social robots, socio-psychological effects, speech, Videos

  • 2015

  • Schäfer, Marie; Haun, Daniel B. M.; Tomasello, Michael (2015): Fair Is Not Fair Everywhere. In: Psychological science 26 (8), S. 1252-1260. DOI: 10.1177/0956797615586188

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615586188 

    Abstract: Distributing the spoils of a joint enterprise on the basis of work contribution or relative productivity seems natural to the modern Western mind. But such notions of merit-based distributive justice may be culturally constructed norms that vary with the social and economic structure of a group. In the present research, we showed that children from three different cultures have very different ideas about distributive justice. Whereas children from a modern Western society distributed the spoils of a joint enterprise precisely in proportion to productivity, children from a gerontocratic pastoralist society in Africa did not take merit into account at all. Children from a partially hunter-gatherer, egalitarian African culture distributed the spoils more equally than did the other two cultures, with merit playing only a limited role. This pattern of results suggests that some basic notions of distributive justice are not universal intuitions of the human species but rather culturally constructed behavioral norms. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

    Keywords: Child, Children, Cross-Cultural Comparison, cross-cultural differences, cross-cultural differences,morality,distributive justice,equity,children,peer interactions, distributive justice, equity, Fairness, Female, Germany, Humans, Kenya, Kulturforschung/ kulturelle Unterschiede, Male, Morality, Namibia, peer interactions, Reward, Social Justice, Verhaltensforschung
  • <<
  • 1