Alle Publikationen

  • Erweiterte Suche öffnen

Treffer: 2
  • <<
  • 1

  • 2015

  • Turiel, Elliot (2015) : Moral Reasoning in Psychology In: Wright, James D.: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition): Oxford: Elsevier, S. 803-805

    Abstract: Developmental research has focused on reasoning about right and wrong in social relationships. Piaget and Kohlberg each proposed sequences in which children first develop moral judgments that are confused with nonmoral features, such as adherence to social conventions, and then judgments differentiating them from each other. However, subsequent research shows that young children form concepts in the moral domain with understandings of welfare and fairness, differing from judgments about social conventions. Moral decisions entail coordination of different concerns – moral and nonmoral – in situational contexts. Individuals critically apply moral judgments to cultural practices entailing social inequalities.

    Keywords: Coordination, Development, Differentiation, Domains, Justice, Moral, Moral Reasoning, Rights, science direct, Social convention, Social hierarchy, Social inequalities, Verhaltensforschung, Welfare

  • 2003

  • Guimond, Serge; Dambrun, Michaël; Michinov, Nicolas; Duarte, Sandra (2003): Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84 (4), S. 697-721. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.697

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.697 

    Abstract: Social dominance orientation (SDO) has been proposed as an important variable in the explanation of prejudice. We distinguish between three conceptualizations of SDO: SDO as a personality trait (personality model), SDO as a moderator of the effects of situational variables (Person X Situation model), and SDO as a mediator of the effect of social position on prejudice (group socialization model [GSM]). Four studies (N = 1,657) looking at the relations between social positions, SDO, and prejudice in a natural setting and in a laboratory setting provide strong support for the GSM. In contrast to previous correlational findings, there is evidence of a cause (dominant social position), an effect (prejudice increases), and a mediator (SDO). These results suggest new perspectives on the integration of individual and contextual determinants of prejudice. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

    Keywords: Hierarchie, Persönlichkeitspsychologie, Social hierarchy, Sozialpsychologie
  • <<
  • 1