Alle Publikationen

Erweiterte Suche öffnen

Treffer: 3

2015
Matelski, Monique H.; Hogg, Michael A. (2015) : Group Processes, Social Psychology of In: Wright, James D.: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition): Oxford: Elsevier, S. 422-427

Abstract: Groups lie at the core of the human experience. Group processes encompass such a wide range of phenomena that the social psychological study of group processes has many different focuses. The study of group processes, in general, concerns the cognitive and social causes and consequences of human aggregation. This article provides a history and review of group processes research including information on group formation, group performance, and group decision making; of how people are socialized into groups and roles within groups; and of how groups influence their members through persuasion, leadership, and norms.

Keywords: Cohesion, collective behavior, Deviance, Group affiliation, Group Decision Making, Group development, Group Performance, Group Structure, Gruppenverhalten, Leadership, norms, Review, science direct, Social Group, Social Identity, social influence, Sozialpsychologie
2012
Schönbrodt, Felix D.; Back, Mitja D.; Schmukle, Stefan C. (2012): TripleR: An R package for social relations analyses based on round-robin designs. In: Behavior research methods 44 (2), S. 455-470. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0150-4

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0150-4

Abstract: In this article, we present TripleR, an R package for the calculation of social relations analyses (Kenny, 1994) based on round-robin designs. The scope of existing software solutions is ported to R and enhanced with previously unimplemented methods of significance testing in single groups (Lashley & Bond, 1997) and handling of missing values. The package requires only minimal knowledge of R, and results can be exported for subsequent analyses to other software packages. We demonstrate the use of TripleR with several didactic examples.

Keywords: Algorithms, Analysis of Variance, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Group Structure, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Models, Psychological, Models, Statistical, Psychology, Social/methods/statistics & numerical data, Research Design, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Software
2006
Anderson, Cameron; Srivastava, Sanjay; Beer, Jennifer S.; Spataro, Sandra E.; Chatman, Jennifer A. (2006): Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. In: Journal of personality and social psychology 91 (6), S. 1094-1110. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1094

DOI: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17144767

Abstract: Status is the prominence, respect, and influence individuals enjoy in the eyes of others. Theories of positive illusions suggest that individuals form overly positive perceptions of their status in face-to-face groups. In contrast, the authors argue that individuals' perceptions of their status are highly accurate--that is, they closely match the group's perception of their status--because forming overly positive status self-perceptions can damage individuals' acceptance in a group. Therefore, the authors further argue that individuals are likely to refrain from status self-enhancement to maintain their belongingness in a group. Support for their hypotheses was found in 2 studies of status in face-to-face groups, using a social relations model approach (D. A. Kenny & L. La Voie, 1984). Individuals showed high accuracy in perceiving their status and even erred on the side of being overly humble. Moreover, enhancement in status self-perceptions was associated with lower levels of social acceptance.

Keywords: Adolescent, Adult, Female, Group Processes, Group Structure, Hierarchy, Social, Humans, Illusions, Individuality, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Personal Construct Theory, Self Concept, Social Identification

2015

2012

2006

poliTE