Alle Publikationen

  • Erweiterte Suche öffnen

Treffer: 5
  • <<
  • 1
  • 2019

  • Papenmeier, Frank; Uhrig, Meike; Kirsch, Alexandra (2019): Human Understanding of Robot Motion: The Role of Velocity and Orientation. In: International Journal of Social Robotics 11 (1), S. 75-88. DOI: 10.1007/s12369-018-0493-4

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0493-4 

    Abstract: A general problem in human–robot interaction is how to test the quality of single robot behavior, in order to develop robust and human-acceptable skills. The most typical approach are user tests with subjective measures (questionnaires). We propose a new experimental paradigm that combines subjective measures with an objective behavioral measure, namely viewing times of images viewed as self-paced slide show. We applied this paradigm to human-aware robot navigation. With three experiments, we studied the influence of two aspects of robot motion: velocity profiles and the robot’s orientation. A decreasing velocity profile influenced the predictability of the observed motion, and robot orientations diverting from the robot’s motion vector caused reduced perceived autonomy ratings. We conclude that the viewing time paradigm is a promising tool for studying human-aware robot behavior and that the design of human-aware robot navigation needs to consider both the velocity and the orientation of robots.

  • 2008

  • Heggestad, Eric D. (2008): A really big picture of social intelligence. In: Journal of Personality Assessment 90 (1), S. 102-104. DOI: 10.1080/00223890701468667

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701468667 

    Abstract: Reviews the book, Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships by D. Goleman (see record [rid]2006-13172-000[/rid]). This book deals with a topic that has been of interest to social scientists for a very long time, namely, how people perceive, react, and interact with the social world in which they live. The current author feels rather than focusing on the relatively narrow concept of social intelligence or on the more broadly defined domain of social effectiveness, the book covers a wide range of topics emanating from the field of social neuroscience. The reviewer discusses this book within the context of theory and research on the psychological concept of social intelligence and the more broadly defined domain of social effectiveness. The current author feels that this book failed to do what the current author had hoped it might from the perspective of the literature on social effectiveness. This book is not about social intelligence; it does not address of deal in any extensive manner with the history of the concept of social intelligence or its measurement. The current author feels at best this book provides some information on the more broadly defined domain of social effectiveness. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

  • 2006

  • Goleman, Daniel (2006): Social intelligence. The new science of human relationships. New York, NY, US: Bantam Books

    Abstract: Far more than we are consciously aware, our daily encounters with parents, spouses, bosses, and even strangers shape our brains and affect cells throughout our bodies-- down to the level of our genes--for good or ill. In Social Intelligence, Daniel Goleman explores an emerging new science with startling implications for our interpersonal world. Its most fundamental discovery: we are designed for sociability, constantly engaged in a 'neural ballet' that connects us brain to brain with those around us. Our reactions to others, and theirs to us, have a far-reaching biological impact, sending out cascades of hormones that regulate everything from our hearts to our immune systems, making good relationships act like vitamins--and bad relationships like poisons. We can 'catch' other people's emotions the way we catch a cold, and the consequences of isolation or relentless social stress can be life-shortening. Goleman explains the surprising accuracy of first impressions, the basis of charisma and emotional power, the complexity of sexual attraction, and how we detect lies. He describes the 'dark side' of social intelligence, from narcissism to Machiavellianism and psychopathy. He also reveals our astonishing capacity for 'mindsight,' as well as the tragedy of those, like autistic children, whose mindsight is impaired. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

  • 2004

  • Ashton, Michael C.; Lee, Kibeom; Perugini, Marco; Szarota, Piotr; Vries, Reinout E. de; Di Blas, Lisa; Boies, Kathleen; Raad, Boele de (2004): A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives. Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. In: Journal of personality and social psychology 86 (2), S. 356-366. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356

    DOI: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14769090 

    Abstract: Standard psycholexical studies of personality structure have produced a similar 6-factor solution in 7 languages (Dutch, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Korean, Polish). The authors report the content of these personality dimensions and interpret them as follows: (a) a variant of Extraversion, defined by sociability and liveliness (though not by bravery and toughness); (b) a variant of Agreeableness, defined by gentleness, patience, and agreeableness (but also including anger and ill temper at its negative pole); (c) Conscientiousness (emphasizing organization and discipline rather than moral conscience); (d) Emotionality (containing anxiety, vulnerability, sentimentality, lack of bravery, and lack of toughness, but not anger or ill temper); (e) Honesty-Humility; (f) Intellect/Imagination/Unconventionality. A potential reorganization of the Big Five factor structure is discussed.

  • 1982

  • Kirchler, Erich; Brandstatter, Hermann (1982): Einstellungsanderung in Abhangigkeit von Ahnlichkeit, Freundlichkeit, Kompromissbereitschaft und Geschlecht des Diskussionspartners. In: Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie 29 (3), S. 417-441

    Abstract: In a dyadic discussion on a decision problem 189 subjects exchanged persuasive arguments and friendly or unfriendly remarks with a partner simulated by a computer program in a 2x2x2x2-design (similar/dissimilar, friendly/unfriendly, feedback on partner's yielding/resisting after the first half of discussion, male/female). For the first part of the discussion it was predicted that similar and friendly partners will be more influential than dissimilar and unfriendly ones, and that unfriendliness of a similar partner will diminish his influence to a higher degree than unfriendliness of a dissimilar partner. None of the predictions were supported by the data. For the seond part of the discussion it was predicted that the partner's willingness to compromise will increase his influence; this was expected to be most prominent with similar and friendly partners. This hypothesis proved to be valid for females only. The unexpected higher order interactions suggest that in social interaction women follow strategies different from those relevant for men. Die Bedeutung von Ahnlichkeit, Freundlichkeit und Kompromissbereitschaft des Diskussionspartners fur Einstellungsanderungen im Diskussionsverlauf wird untersucht. 189 Versuchspersonen tauschten uber Computer-Terminals Argumente und mehr oder weniger freundliche Bemerkungen mit einem simulierten Partner aus, um gemeinsam ein Entscheidungsproblem zu losen. Jede Versuchsperson war einer der 16 Versuchsbedingungen des 2x2x2x2-Versuchsplans zugeordnet. (Partner: ahnlich/unahnlich, freundlich/unfreundlich, kompromissbereit/nicht kompromissbereit gemass Ruckmeldung nach der ersten Diskussionshalfte, Versuchsperson: maennlich/weiblich.) Fur die erste Halfte der Diskussion war vorhergesagt, dass sowohl ein ahnlicher als auch ein freundlicher Partner mehr Einfluss hat als ein unahnlicher und unfreundlicher, und dass sich Unfreundlichkeit eines ahnlichen Partners starker einflussmindernd auswirkt als Unfreundlichkeit eines unahnlichen Partners. Keine dieser Vorhersagen wurde bestatigt. Fur den zweiten Teil der Diskussion war erwartet worden, dass sich Kompromissbereitschaft einflussfordernd auswirkt, und dies insbesondere mit ahnlichen und freundlichen Partnern. Diese Hypothese bestatigte sich nur bei den weiblichen Versuchspersonen. Die unerwarteten Wechselwirkungen hoherer Ordnung lassen vermuten, dass Frauen und Manner in der sozialen Interaktion unterschiedliche Ziele und Strategien verfolgen. zitiert von 5

  • <<
  • 1