Alle Publikationen

  • Erweiterte Suche öffnen

Treffer: 2
  • <<
  • 1
  • 2017

  • Simon, Bernd (2017) : Grundriss einer sozialpsychologischen Respekttheorie Hogrefe Verlag . Online verfügbar unter https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1026/0033-3042/a000326 , zuletzt geprüft am 23.02.2018

     

    Abstract: Outline of a Social Psychological Theory of Respect: Implications for Cooperation and Conflict in Pluralistic Societies Abstract. In this article, I outline a social psychological theory of respect with a particular emphasis on the importance of respect for social life in pluralistic societies. Building on social recognition approaches in social philosophy, I first elaborate on a conception of respect as equality recognition. Subsequently, I discuss empirical findings from our own program of research, which validate the proposed respect concept and illuminate important social consequences of respect (as well as of disrespect). I close with some considerations regarding the dynamics of respect and possible trajectories of politicized struggles for recognition in pluralistic societies.

  • 2004

  • Russell, Brenda L.; Trigg, Kristin Y. (2004): Tolerance of Sexual Harassment. An Examination of Gender Differences, Ambivalent Sexism, Social Dominance, and Gender Roles. In: Sex Roles 50 (7/8), S. 565-573. DOI: 10.1023/B:SERS.0000023075.32252.fd

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000023075.32252.fd 

    Abstract: In this study we examined the effects of gender, gender roles (masculinity and femininity), ambivalent sexism, and social dominance orientation with regard to tolerance of sexual harassment. It was predicted that women would be less tolerant than men of sexual harassment, however, men and women who were tolerant of sexual harassment would share ambivalence and hostility toward women, and they would exhibit higher levels of social dominance and masculinity. Results partially supported the hypotheses. Women were significantly less tolerant of harassment than men were, however, regression analyses showed that ambivalent sexism and hostility toward women accounted for the majority of total variance (35%), followed by gender (5%), social dominance (1%), femininity (0.7%), and nonsexism (0.6%). Masculinity and benevolent sexism were not significant predictors. Results suggest that ambivalence and hostility toward women are much greater predictors of tolerance of sexual harassme nt than is gender alone. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved)

  • <<
  • 1