Alle Publikationen

  • Erweiterte Suche öffnen

Treffer: 3
  • <<
  • 1

  • 2017

  • Wijayanto, Agus; Prasetyarini, Aryati; Hikmat, Mauly Halwat (2017): Impoliteness in EFL. Foreign Language Learners’ Complaining Behaviors Across Social Distance and Status Levels. In: SAGE Open 7 (3). DOI: 10.1177/2158244017732816

    Abstract: A growing body of literature has investigated impoliteness in many domains. Nevertheless, little research has examined impoliteness done by foreign language learners. Impoliteness used in interlanguage complaints by English as a foreign language learners was observed. The effects of interlocutors' different status levels and social distance on the use of impoliteness were analyzed. Empirical data were elicited by means of oral discourse completion tasks from 50 Indonesian English as a foreign language learners in Central Java, Indonesia. The overall direction of the findings showed trends that status levels and social distance between interlocutors prompted different frequencies and strategies of impoliteness. The frequent use of impolite complaints was instigated by a number of factors such as the learners' understanding about the speech act in question, their perceptions on the social distance and status levels of interlocutors, and the nature of the research instrument.

    Keywords: Favoriten, Impolite Talk, (Individueller) Sprachstil, Muttersprachler vs. Zweitsprachler, Soziale Distanz, Soziale Hierarchie, Sprachgebrauch, time

  • 2011

  • Neurauter-Kessels, Manuela (2011): Im/polite reader responses on British online news sites. In: Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 7 (2), S. 187-214. DOI: 10.1515/jplr.2011.010

    Abstract: Impolite and aggressive behaviour of anonymous users appears to be an important feature of online newspaper comments. This paper identifies and investigates how impoliteness is utilized strategically by newspaper readers to attack the author of an article. Empirical data is drawn from "Have-your-say" sections of the Guardian Online, Times Online and Telegraph Online. Results illustrate that impolite moves frequently involve face-threats that question the jourbalists' authority, credibility and trustworthiness. In the main part of the paper a categorization scheme for different types of impolite moves is introduced and a working definition of impoliteness in the context of "Have-your-say" sections presented. After having sketched a number of fundamental methodological and theoretical challenges in impoliteness research, the paper also demonstrates how the communicative setting and medium influence the realization and interpretation of impolite behaviour in those forms of public debates. Given the challenge of identifying and conceptualizing impoliteness in general and more specifically in a computer-mediated environment, etiquette rules prove especially useful for norms of appropriateness. It is also argued that the strength of those face-threats may be boosted by the fact that they are uttered in front of large audience and more specifically the journalist's readership.

    Keywords: Art des Kommunikationsmediums, Diskurse in Anwesenheit von Zuhörerschaft/Leserschaft/Audience, Face, Face-threatening acts, Have-your-say sections for readers, Impolite Talk, Infragestellen von Autorität, Infragestellen von Glaubwürdigkeit, Infragestellen von Vertrauenswürdigkeit, Medien, Öffentlicher vs. privater Raum, Online-Journalismus, Rolle (Beruf), Situationsbedingter Kontext, Sozialer Raum / Kultureller Kontext, time

  • 2010

  • Angouri, Jo; Tseliga, Theodora (2010): “You Have No Idea What You are Talking About!. ” From e-disagreement to e-impoliteness in two online fora. In: Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 6 (1). DOI: 10.1515/jplr.2010.004

    Abstract: This paper reports on an ongoing project in the area of intentional impoliteness as perceived by the participants and as marked in discourse in the asynchronous Computer Mediated Communication (CMC) context. We focus on occurrences of “impolite talk” and examine the context bound nature of communicative strategies adopted by the interactants in order to deliberately do impoliteness. We also analyze how impoliteness is lexicalized in relation to the inherent characteristics of the CMC context. Specifically, this paper draws on a sample of data from two Communities of Practice (CofP): Greek students and professional academics. 200 posts were collected from interactions where dispute occurred. Special attention is paid to the use of spelling and punctuation and one interactional discourse particle, namely [re] (untranslatable), in unmitigated confrontational disagreement that breaches the norms of unmarked behaviour in the two CofPs. Our preliminary findings show that (im)politeness is firmly embedded in the micro (discourse) and macro (social) context. The impoliteness strategies employed by the interactants indicate different judgements of what constitutes marked behaviour and are contingent on factors such as the overall purpose of communication, the co-constructed norms of the forum, the relationship between participants and the dynamic group identities which the interactants call upon in any given situation.

    Keywords: Art des Kommunikationsmediums, breach of social interaction, computervermittelte Kommunikation, Disziplin, doppelter Treffer, Höflichkeit, Höflichkeitsforschung, Impolite Talk, Impoliteness, Informations- & Kommunikationstechnik, Linguistik, Mediationstheorie, Mensch-Technik-Relationen (MTR), online-communities, online-Foren, Online-Kommunikation, Philosophie, Politeness, Realtechnik, Situationsbedingter Kontext, social media, Soziale Angemessenheit, Sprachgebrauch, Technik, Technikbezug, Technikphilosophie
  • <<
  • 1