Alle Publikationen
- <<
- <
- 1
2013
-
(2013): Ontology-based state representations for intention recognition in human–robot collaborative environments. In: Robotics and Autonomous Systems 61 (11), S. 1224-1234. DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2013.04.004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2013.04.004 Abstract: In this paper, we describe a novel approach for representing state information for the purpose of intention recognition in cooperative human–robot environments. States are represented by a combination of spatial relationships in a Cartesian frame along with cardinal direction information. This approach is applied to a manufacturing kitting operation, where humans and robots are working together to develop kits. Based upon a set of predefined high-level state relationships that must be true for future actions to occur, a robot can use the detailed state information described in this paper to infer the probability of subsequent actions occurring. This would allow the robot to better help the human with the task or, at a minimum, better stay out of his or her way. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
Keywords: Bedienung & Handhabung, Environmental Effects, Human Machine Systems, human robot environments, Intention, intention recognition, Intentional Learning, Knowledge representation, Ontology (Philosophy), ontology based state representations, Recognition (Learning), Robotics, Spatial Learning, spatial relationships 2006
-
Hertwig, Ralph (2006): Do legal rules rule behavior?. Heuristics and the law. Berlin, Germany. Berlin, Germany: Dahlem University Press (Dahlem workshop reports)
Abstract: Economic analyses of law share an implicit or explicit belief in unbounded rationality. Here two boundedly rational psychological principles are discussed that together provide an alternative explanation for why most people behave in accordance with legal rules most of the time. These principles are the capacity for social learning and the impact of environmental cues and constraints. The ability to observe others' behavior and its consequences helps people conform to behavioral norms without memorizing the legal canon or Miss Manners's rules of etiquette. Environmental and institutional constraints help winnow down the set of actions available to people, and environmental cues suggest which of the available actions are desirable. If people who aspire to live by legal rules, standards, and institutions are to have a chance of doing so, lawmakers must recognize the psychological realities of boundedly rational decision making. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) zitiert von 13
- <<
- <
- 1