Alle Publikationen
- <<
- <
- 1
2017
-
(2017): Do We Gossip for Moral Reasons?. The Intersection of Moral Foundations and Gossip. In: Basic and Applied Social Psychology 39 (4), S. 218-230. DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2017.1336713
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.1336713 Abstract: Gossip is comprised of evaluative talk about absent others. Although such evaluations may be moral or non-moral, moral judgments often precede the transmission of gossip. This work explored the salience of moral and non-moral motivations to transmit gossip-like information. Two studies explored the relationships between the general tendency to gossip, transmission of, and interest in gossip, five moral foundations (Harm/care, Fairness/reciprocity, Ingroup/loyalty, Authority/respect, Purity/sanctity), their sacredness in relational contexts, and moral and non-moral motives to gossip. Results from Studies 1 (negative gossip—infidelity) and 2 (positive gossip—fidelity) indicated that moral motives to gossip were more important than non-moral motives. The contribution of morality in perpetuating gossip was discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved)
Keywords: Authority, Fairness, Gossip, Ingroup Outgroup, Moral, Loyalty, Morality, Reciprocity, respect, social psychology, Sozialpsychologie 2015
-
(2015): Coordination, Collaboration and Cooperation. In: Interaction Studies 16 (3), S. 383-418. DOI: 10.1075/is.16.3.03ami
Abstract: Reviews the literature on the evolution and development of human cooperation, emphasizing important aspects of intercultural variation in collaborative and cooperative behavior. Humans have attained an unparalleled level of sophistication when engaging in collaborative and cooperative activities. Remarkably, the skills and motivation to engage in complex forms of collaboration and cooperation seem to emerge early on during infancy and childhood. The authors confront the different evolutionary scenarios in which cooperation may have emerged and provide the reader with a first orientation in the abundant literature on human cooperation. zitiert von 4
-
(2015): The evolution and development of human cooperation. In: Interaction Studies 16 (3), S. 383-418
Abstract: Reviews the literature on the evolution and development of human cooperation, emphasizing important aspects of intercultural variation in collaborative and cooperative behavior. Humans have attained an unparalleled level of sophistication when engaging in collaborative and cooperative activities. Remarkably, the skills and motivation to engage in complex forms of collaboration and cooperation seem to emerge early on during infancy and childhood. The authors confront the different evolutionary scenarios in which cooperation may have emerged and provide the reader with a first orientation in the abundant literature on human cooperation.
2012
-
(2012): Presence, reciprocity and robotic mediations: The case of autonomous social roots. In: International Journal of Technoethics 3 (2), S. 9-16. DOI: 10.4018/jte.2012040102
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/jte.2012040102 Abstract: In this paper, the author proposes a theoretical framework for drawing a line between acceptable and non-acceptable technologies, with a focus on autonomous social robots. The author considers robots as mediations and their ethical acceptance as depending on their impact on the notion of presence. Presence is characterised by networks of reciprocity which make human beings subject and object of actions and perceptions at the same time. Technological mediation can either promote or inhibit the reciprocity of presence. A medium that inhibits presence deserves ethical evaluation since it prevents the possibility of a mutual exchange, thus creating a form of power. Autonomous social robots are a special kind of technological mediation because they replace human presence with a simulation of presence. Therefore, in interactions between human beings and autonomous robots, attention should be paid to the consequences on legal, moral, and social responsibility, and, at the same time, the impact of simulated forms of presence on human beings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)
2011
-
(2011): Vom Experiment zur Praxis. Wie moralische Argumente wirtschaftliche Selbstinteressen beeinflussen. In: KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 63 (1), S. 61-81. DOI: 10.1007/s11577-011-0129-2
Abstract: Es wird der Frage nachgegangen, wie moralische Argumente wirtschaftlich selbstinteressiertes Handeln beeinflussen. Laborexperimente von Verhaltensökonomen untersuchen dies, doch ihre zentralen Ergebnisse wurden noch nicht in der Praxis getestet. Ein Forschungsprojekt rekonstruierte anhand von Fallstudien, wie moralische Argumente in Diskussionen um Produktionsverlagerung wirtschaftliche Selbstinteressen beeinflussen. Es zeigt sich, dass moralisches Verhalten, welches im Diktator-, Ultimatum- und Kollektivgutspiel nachgewiesen wird, auch reales wirtschaftliches Handeln beeinflusst. Menschen verzichten auf die Maximierung ihres materiellen Nutzens, um moralischen Verhaltensregeln zu entsprechen. Die Ergebnisse verhaltensökonomischer Experimente, aber auch die Rekonstruktion wirtschaftlichen Handelns, verweisen somit auf ein Akteursmodell, das Gegenseitigkeit und auch gesellschaftliche Rolle beachtet und dadurch wirtschaftliches Handeln in vielen Situationen präziser erklärt als bisher vorherrschende Modelle. Dieses Modell wiederum in Laborexperimenten zu testen, wird aufgrund der Ergebnisse dieses Artikels nahegelegt. (Autorenreferat) zitiert von: 14
-
(2011): The communication of anger and disappointment helps to establish cooperation through indirect reciprocity. In: Journal of Economic Psychology 32 (3), S. 489-501. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2011.03.016
Abstract: Abstract Indirect reciprocity is cooperation through reputation: third parties cooperate with those known to cooperate and defect against those known to defect. Defection, then, can have the unjust motive of greed or the just motive of retaliation. To establish cooperation, observers should distinguish both motives for defection and respond more cooperatively to the latter. We propose that the expression of emotions may facilitate this inferential process. Indeed, in two laboratory studies participants inferred that defection out of anger or disappointment was a just response to a defector and they responded more cooperatively than when no emotion was communicated. Moreover, participants inferred that defectors who evoked disappointment instead of anger had a relatively positive reputation. We conclude that emotions help establish cooperation through indirect reciprocity. Highlights ► Anger and disappointment signal who have defected in indirect reciprocity. ► Expressing anger or disappointment helps justify one’s defection against a defector. ► Defection out of anger or disappointment elicits relatively cooperative responses. ► Disappointment signals that a defector’s reputation is more positive than does anger. ► Anger and disappointment function as lubricants of indirect reciprocity. zitiert von 19
1994
-
(1994): Interpersonal perception. A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford Press. Online verfügbar unter http://www.loc.gov/catdir/bios/guilford051/94008552.htmlKeywords: Assimilation, Concensus, Interaktion, Interaktionsanalyse, Interpersonale Wahrnehmung, Interpersonelle Beziehungen, Modell, Other-Perception, Reciprocity, Selbstbild, Self-Perception, Social Perception, social relations model, Soziale Beziehungen, Soziale Wahrnehmung, Sozialpsychologie, Urteilsbildung, Verhaltensanalyse, Verhaltensforschung, Wahrnehmung
- <<
- <
- 1